![]() There’s simply no method known to medieval man or even to modern man to create an image with the amazing properties the Shroud has. No pigment, no chemicals, no brush strokes, no clumping of fibers or threads, no cracking of the image along fold lines are present, so the image is not created by any paint, stain, dye, or chemical treatment.This dating seemed to end the question of authenticity, but the accuracy of the testing has come into question for numerous scientific reasons, and today many scientists consider it flawed.įurther undermining the accuracy of the C 14 dating is the overwhelming body of evidence strongly pointing to the Shroud’s authenticity. Let’s acknowledge right from the beginning “the elephant in the room”-the 1988 Carbon 14 test that dated the Shroud to around 1300 AD. And the overwhelming majority of the evidence falls in favor of it being the authentic burial cloth of a crucified man who happened to experience the same tortures Jesus endured, as described in the Gospels. While many people claim it is a forgery, none of these skeptics seems to be able to explain how it was done. Hundreds of thousands of hours have been spent on scientific examination of the Shroud of Turin in an attempt to explain its enigmatic markings. I hope you’ll read what I’ve discovered prayerfully and meditatively, and allow yourself, too, to be deeply moved. I must tell you, my research affected me profoundly, and I don’t think I’ll be able to look at a crucifix casually ever again. ![]() ![]() Having recently finished an article on the Eucharistic Miracles proven by science, I was curious to learn more about the scientific evidence regarding the Shroud of Turin, believed since ancient times to be the actual linens used in Jesus’ burial (John 19:39-40). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |